0161 909 3400

Is The Times’ Paywall Failing Spectacularly? Or Just Badly?


About a month ago, The FirstFound Blog brought you news of The Times website relaunching as a paid-for subscriber service.  We ended that article with a question:

Will you be willing to pay for online news? If you currently read The Times online, will you stump up or move on?

Now, it looks like we’ve got our answer.

Mixed figures are coming in on how badly the site is performing. The Guardian is reporting that 90% of The Times’ readership has deserted for free-to-read services, whilst the Financial Times is going with a slightly healthier decline of two thirds (stats taken from here).

Whichever number is closer to the truth, one thing is clear. People aren’t embracing paid-for news. And less readers means less advertising revenue. It could well be the case that charging for content could well lose money in the long run.

And that could spell the end of the great paywall experiment.

Be Sociable, Share!
  • more Is The Times’ Paywall Failing Spectacularly? Or Just Badly?
This entry was posted in FirstFound News and tagged failure, murdoch, paywall, times. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Is The Times’ Paywall Failing Spectacularly? Or Just Badly?

  1. Pingback: Huffington Post Hits The UK FirstFound Blog

  2. Pingback: Is The Times Paywall Downtime a Marketing Ploy? - Copywriting Blog - Unmemorable Title

  3. Pingback: Paying For Content? No Thanks! FirstFound Blog

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>